Add Zoghby response
This commit is contained in:
parent
216c7dd7c8
commit
e683438ad0
|
@ -0,0 +1,123 @@
|
|||
---
|
||||
title: Letter from Rome on Zoghby Proposal
|
||||
date: 1997-06-11
|
||||
author: Joseph Cardinal Ratzinger
|
||||
source: https://orthocath.files.wordpress.com/2011/01/1997_letter_from_rome_on_zoghby_initiative-11.pdf
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
**Congregation for the Eastern Churches Prot. No. 251/75**
|
||||
**June 11, 1997**
|
||||
**His Beatitude Maximos V HAKIM**
|
||||
**Greek-Melkite Catholic Patriarch of Antioch and of all the East, of Alexandria and of Jerusalem**
|
||||
|
||||
Your Beatitude,
|
||||
|
||||
Word of the project for a rapprochement between the Greek-Melkite Catholic Patriarchate and
|
||||
the Orthodox Patriarchate of Antioch has been widely noted and given rise to much public
|
||||
discussion.
|
||||
|
||||
The Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, the Congregation for the Eastern Churches, and
|
||||
the Pontifical Council for Christian Unity have striven to familiarize themselves and examine
|
||||
with care those aspects that lie within their respective competence; the heads of these Dicasteries
|
||||
have further been charged by the Holy Father to share some observations with Your Beatitude.
|
||||
|
||||
The Holy See follows with great interest and wishes to encourage initiatives that could ease the
|
||||
way to a complete reconciliation of the Christian Churches. It recognizes the imperatives behind
|
||||
the decades-long effort of the Greek-Melkite Catholic Patriarchate aimed at promoting the
|
||||
realization of this sought-for fullness of communion. The Code of Canon Law for the Eastern
|
||||
Churches recognizes in this a duty for every Christian (Can. 902), that becomes for the Eastern
|
||||
Catholic Churches a special munus (Can. 903), to be pursued according to "*normis specialibus*
|
||||
*iuris particularis moderante eundem motum Sede Apostolica Romana pro universa Ecclesia*"
|
||||
["by the special norms of particular law, the Apostolic Roman See directing the movement for
|
||||
the entire Church"] (Can. 904).
|
||||
|
||||
This is all the more valid for two communities that see themselves as especially tied to one
|
||||
another from their common origin and shared ecclesial tradition, as well as through a long
|
||||
experience of joint initiatives, placing them without a doubt in a privileged state of closeness.
|
||||
|
||||
It is the wish of the Church that appropriate ways and means be found to proceed in future along
|
||||
the path of fraternal agreement, and through the assistance of new forms that would allow the
|
||||
further realization of progress towards full communion.
|
||||
|
||||
Your Patriarchate, in pursuing such goals, is spurred by the sensitivity, the situational
|
||||
understanding, and the experience that are uniquely its own. The Holy See intends to aid this
|
||||
process through the formulation of a few observations that it believes could contribute to a future
|
||||
furthering of the initiative.
|
||||
|
||||
The responsible Dicasteries broadly welcome joint pastoral initiatives between Catholics and
|
||||
Orthodox, undertaken as proposed in the Directory for the Application of the Principles and
|
||||
Norms on Ecumenism, most particularly in the fields of Christian formation, education, common
|
||||
charitable endeavours, and shared prayer when this is possible.
|
||||
|
||||
Specifically with respect to theological heritage, one must proceed with patience and prudence,
|
||||
and without precipitation, in order to assist both parties in following a shared path.
|
||||
|
||||
A first dimension of this sharing concerns the language and categories used in the dialogue: one
|
||||
has to apply the greatest care that the common use of a word, or of a concept, not lend itself to
|
||||
differing points of view or interpretations of a historical or doctrinal nature, nor to any form of
|
||||
over simplification.
|
||||
|
||||
A second dimension necessitates that the sharing of the contents of the dialogue not be limited
|
||||
solely to the two direct interlocutors, the Greek-Melkite Catholic and Orthodox Antiochian
|
||||
Patriarchates, but that it should also implicate the wider Confessions with which the two
|
||||
Patriarchates are in full communion: the Catholic Communion for the former, and the Orthodox
|
||||
Communion for the latter. The Orthodox ecclesiastical authorities in the Patriarchate of Antioch
|
||||
have, in any case, highlighted analogous concerns. This more comprehensive participation would
|
||||
also help ensure that initiatives aimed at promoting full communion at the local level do not give
|
||||
rise to misunderstandings or suspicions, even with the best of intentions.
|
||||
|
||||
Let us now turn to the terms of the profession of faith of his Excellence Mgr. Elias Zoghby,
|
||||
Greek-Melkite Catholic Archbishop emeritus of Baalbeck, signed in February 1995, and to
|
||||
which many prelates of the Greek-Melkite Catholic Synod have subscribed.
|
||||
|
||||
It is evident that this Patriarchate forms an integral part of the Christian East whose patrimony it
|
||||
shares. With respect to the declaration on the part of Greek-Melkite Catholics of complete
|
||||
adherence to the teachings of Eastern Orthodoxy, one must keep in mind the fact that the
|
||||
Orthodox Churches are today not yet in full communion with the Church of Rome, and that this
|
||||
adherence is thus not possible so long as there is not from both sides an identity of professed and
|
||||
practiced faith. Furthermore, a correct formulation of the faith requires reference not only to a
|
||||
particular Church, but to the whole of the Church of Christ that is limited in neither space nor
|
||||
time.
|
||||
|
||||
With respect to communion with the Bishops of Rome, one must not forget that doctrine relating
|
||||
to the primacy of the Roman Pontiff has been the subject of some development within the
|
||||
elaboration of the Church's faith through the ages, and that it must thus be upheld in its entirety
|
||||
from its origins all the way to the present day. One need only reflect on what the First Vatican
|
||||
Council affirms and on what has been declared at the Second Vatican Council, particularly in
|
||||
NN. 22 and 23 of the Dogmatic Constitution *Lumen Gentium* and in N. 2 of the Decree on
|
||||
Ecumenism *Unitatis Redintegratio*.
|
||||
|
||||
As to the ways in which the Petrine ministry could be exercised today, an issue distinct from that
|
||||
of doctrine, it is true that the Holy Father has recently reminded us all how it is possible to
|
||||
"seek—together, of course—the forms in which this ministry may accomplish a service of love
|
||||
recognized by all concerned" (*Ut unum sint*, 95): but while it is also legitimate to approach the
|
||||
issue at the local level, there is a duty to do so always in communion with a view to the universal
|
||||
Church. In this regard, it would in any case be appropriate to recall that "the Catholic Church,
|
||||
both in her *praxis* and in her solemn documents, holds that the communion of the particular
|
||||
Churches with the Church of Rome, and of their Bishops with the Bishop of Rome, is—in God's
|
||||
plan—an essential requisite of full and visible communion" (*Ut unum sint*, 97).
|
||||
|
||||
As to the various aspects of *communio in sacris*, an ongoing dialogue will have to be maintained
|
||||
in order to explore the rationale underlying the respective norms currently in effect, and this in
|
||||
light of the theological assumptions that underlie them; in this way premature unilateral
|
||||
initiatives or eventual outcomes that would not have pondered sufficiently might be avoided:
|
||||
these could lead to significant negative consequences, including with respect to other Eastern
|
||||
Catholics, most especially to those living within the same region.
|
||||
|
||||
All in all, the fraternal dialogue pursued by the Greek-Melkite Patriarchate will contribute all the
|
||||
more to the path of ecumenism insofar as it strives to include in the development of new
|
||||
sensibilities the whole Catholic Church to which it belongs. There is a good basis for believing
|
||||
that Orthodoxy also shares this concern, and this largely also in consideration of the
|
||||
requirements for communion within its own body.
|
||||
|
||||
The Dicasteries concerned are ready to offer their collaboration in furthering this exchange of
|
||||
reflections and clarifications; they further express their satisfaction with the meetings held so far
|
||||
on this subject with representatives of the Greek-Melkite Catholic Church, and both hope and
|
||||
wish to see these exchanges maintained and deepened in future.
|
||||
|
||||
Fully recognizing that Your Beatitude will wish to share these reflections, please accept the
|
||||
expression of our fraternal and cordial regards.
|
||||
|
||||
Joseph Card. Ratzinger
|
||||
Achille Card. Silvestrini
|
||||
Edward Card. Cassidy
|
|
@ -24,6 +24,7 @@ Any errors are my own.
|
|||
* North American Consultation — [Conciliarity and Primacy](./naoctc-1989-primacy.html)
|
||||
* Joint International Dialogue — [Balamand document](./jictd-1993-balamand.html)
|
||||
* North American Consultation — [Response to Balamand](./naoctc-1994-balamand.html)
|
||||
* Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith — [Response to the Zoghby Proposal](./cdf-1997-zoghby.md)
|
||||
|
||||
## 2000s
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue